COCA Provider Directory
- Role
- Product Designer
- Timeline
- 2021 · 4 months
- Platform
- Responsive Web
- Ownership
- Research, IA, interaction design, accessibility, content strategy
- Outcome
- Shipped; contributed to 400%+ growth in site traffic
Overview
The Central Ohio Counseling Association needed to make it meaningfully easier for people seeking mental health support to find the right provider. The existing "directory" was a Microsoft Word document: a static list with no search, no filtering, and no way to evaluate fit. It lived on a mostly static site that saw very little traffic.
The provider directory wasn't a redesign. It was a net-new feature added to a site that had no interactive functionality. Finding a therapist is a high-stakes, emotionally loaded decision, and the complete absence of a usable tool was a direct barrier to people getting care.
This wasn't a feature improvement. It was building a discovery system from scratch, on a site that had never had one, in a deeply human context.
Problem
A Word doc is not a discovery system
The existing provider directory was a downloadable Word document: a flat and outdated list of names and phone numbers with no structure, no filtering, and no way to evaluate whether a provider was a good fit. Most people seeking therapy don't know what to search for. They know how they feel, what kind of support they need, and what practical constraints they have: insurance, location, session format, availability.
- No way to filter by insurance accepted, telehealth, or sliding-scale fees
- No provider profiles, so no context for deciding who might fit
- No search, no sort, no structure of any kind
- No interactive features anywhere on the site to build on
- COCA staff fielded the calls this created, one at a time
The result was that people either called COCA directly for help navigating the list, or gave up before finding a provider at all.
Decisions
Three decisions that shaped the directory
- 01
Filter-first, not search-first
Most people seeking therapy don't know what to search for. The primary entry point became structured filters (insurance, session format, availability) rather than a text search box.
- 02
Human language, not clinical labels
Profiles lead with an "about my approach" statement in the provider's own voice, not a list of credentials. Research showed this drove contact decisions more than any other factor.
- 03
Build new, don't retrofit
Rather than adding features to a static WordPress site, I designed a standalone directory that could be embedded with no dependency on the legacy codebase.
Research
Listening to people in a vulnerable moment
I conducted moderated usability sessions with eight participants who had recently searched for a therapist, some successful in finding one and some not. Sessions combined task-based testing of the existing directory with a semi-structured interview about their real-world search process.
I also audited the existing directory against WCAG 2.1 AA standards and interviewed six COCA staff members who regularly received calls from people who couldn't navigate the site, which proved a rich source of real failure patterns.
What the research revealed
- 01 Do they take my insurance? Not available
- 02 Do they offer telehealth? Not available
- 03 What does their approach feel like? Not available
- 04 What are their formal credentials? Listed, and ranked last by users
Every participant named insurance or session format first.
- Profile depth drove contact decisions. Participants were significantly more likely to contact a provider whose profile explained their approach in human language, versus one that listed only specialties.
- The search experience felt clinical and cold. Several participants used the word "scary" when describing having to start over after a failed search.
Solution
From search-first to filter-first discovery
The redesigned directory leads with the filters users actually use: insurance, session format (telehealth / in-person / both), availability, and specialty area. Free-text search is still present but no longer the primary path.
Richer, more human provider profiles
Profiles were restructured to lead with the information that drives contact decisions: insurance accepted, session formats, a short "about my approach" statement in the provider's own voice, and clear availability signals. Credentials and clinical details are still present but positioned below the decision-driving content.
Original field order
- Name and credentials
- Degrees and licensure
- Specialty codes
- Phone number
Nothing here answers "is this person right for me?"
Redesigned field order
- Insurance accepted
- Session format and availability
- "About my approach," in their words
- Specialty areas
- Credentials and licensure
The first three answer it before anyone scrolls.
Warm, accessible visual design
The visual redesign used a warmer color palette and softer typography to reduce the clinical feel identified in research. All components were rebuilt to meet WCAG 2.1 AA, with proper focus states, sufficient contrast, and a mobile-first layout that works on every screen size.
Content strategy for providers
A key deliverable was a content guide for providers on how to write their "about my approach" statements, giving them a structure that helped users evaluate fit without requiring extensive writing.
Live Demo
An interactive walkthrough of the directory as it shipped. Try the filters, search, and explore the provider results to see the filter-first discovery model in action.
Designs shown reflect the product at the time of my involvement. The live product has since evolved.
Outcomes
Usability testing of the redesign showed significant improvement across all primary metrics, with particular gains in task completion and perceived confidence. The directory shipped, replacing the Word document entirely.
After launch, the site it lived on saw its traffic grow by more than 400%. A directory people could actually use turned a page nobody visited into the reason they came.
- A flat list, read top to bottom
- No way to narrow it down
- Filters first, because that is how people arrive
- Profiles in the provider's own words
This project reminded me that good information architecture isn't neutral. In a healthcare context, it's the difference between someone finding help and giving up before they do.